Microtensile Bond Strength of Total-Etch and Self-Etch Universal Adhesives Containing 10-MDP: A Systematic Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12974/2311-8695.2022.10.03Keywords:
10-MDP, Dental bonding, Self-etch, Total-etch, Universal adhesive, Microtensile bond strength, Systematic reviewAbstract
A systematic review was performed to compare the human dentin microtensile bond strength of universal adhesives with 10-MDP when used as total-etch and self-etch strategies. Literature search was done on October 2019 without limitations on the language of publication, in four databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and EBSCO. Additional manual search was done for the grey literature articles: OpenGrey and OpenThesis. Studies that evaluated the dentin bond strength of universal adhesives with 10-MDP using total-etch and self-etch strategy from the year 2000 up till October 2019 were included. The initial search resulted in 5121 references: 2234 from PubMed, 1814 from Scopus, 516 from Web of Science, 553 from EBSCO and 4 from OpenThesis. After full text analysis, 30 references were included in this systematic review. Seven different universal adhesives with 10-MDP were evaluated for dentin microtensile bond strength comparing total-etch and self-etch strategies: Single Bond Universal/Scotchbond Universal (3M ESPE), All Bond Universal (Bisco), Clearfil Universal Bond (Kuraray), G-Premio Bond (GC Corp), Tetric Bond Universal (Ivoclar Vivadent), Ambar Universal (FGM) and One Coat 7 Universal (Coltene). The total-etch strategy improved the dentine microtensile bond strength compared to self-etch strategy for all universal adhesives when stored in all three conditions: 24h, thermocycling and long-term immersion according to ISO (TS 11405:2015(E)). The evidence suggests that microtensile bond strength of universal adhesives containing 10-MDP may be improved utilizing total-etch strategy compared to self-etch strategy. This study provides valuable information on the importance of appropriate dentin adhesives strategy that affect success rate of restorations, which helps clinicians to make informed decisions on the strategy to be used during restorations in practice.
References
Sharma RD, Sharma J, Rani A. Comparative evaluation of marginal adaptation between nanocomposites and microhybrid composites exposed to two light cure units. Indian Journal of Dental Research. 2011 May 1; 22(3): 495. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9290.87082
Dacic S, Veselinovic AM, Mitic A, Nikolic M, Cenic M, Dacic-Simonovic D. Marginal adaptation of composite resins under two adhesive techniques. Microscopy research and technique. 2016 Nov; 79(11): 1031-7. https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.22738
Catelan A, Giorgi MC, Soares GP, Lima DA, Marchi GM, Aguiar FH. Effect of different monomer-based composites and ac id etching pre-treatment of enamel on the microleakage using self-etch adhesives systems. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 2014 Nov 1; 72(8): 651-5. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2014.887771
Summit JB, Summitt's Fundamental of Operative Dentistry: A Contemporary Approach, 4th edition, Indian edition, 2014.
Sofan E, Sofan A, Palaia G, Tenore G, Romeo U, Migliau G. Classification review of dental adhesive systems: from the IV generation to the universal type. Annali di stomatologia. 2017 Jan; 8(1): 1. https://doi.org/10.11138/ads/2017.8.1.001
Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. OPERATIVE DENTISTRY-UNIVERSITY OF Washington-. 2003 Oct; 28(3): 215-35.
Karaman E, Güler E. Marginal Adaptation of Class V Restorations with a New Universal Adhesive. International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry. 2016 Jan 1; 36(1). https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.2598
Cuevas-Suárez CE, de Oliveira da Rosa WL, Lund RG, da Silva AF, Piva E. Bonding Performance of Universal Adhesives: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta- Analysis. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2019 Jan 1; 21(1).
Carrilho E, Cardoso M, Marques Ferreira M, Marto CM, Paula A, Coelho AS. 10-MDP Based Dental Adhesives: Adhesive Interface Characterization and Adhesive Stability-A Systematic Review. Materials. 2019 Jan; 12(5): 790. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12050790
Moher D, Shamseer L, C larke M, Ghers i D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, Shekelle P, Stewart LA. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic reviews. 2015 Dec; 4(1): 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
da Rosa WL, Piva E, da Silva AF. Bond strength of universal adhesives: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of dentistry. 2015 Jul 1; 43(7): 765-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.04.003
De Munck J, Luehrs AK, Poitevin A, Van Ende A, Van Meerbeek B. Fracture toughness versus micro-tensile bond strength testing of adhesive-dentin interfaces. Dental Materials. 2013 Jun 1; 29(6): 635-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2013.03.010
Wang R, Shi Y, Li T, Pan Y, Cui Y, Xia W. Adhesive interfacial characteristics and the related bonding performance of four self-etching adhesives with different functional monomers applied to dentin. Journal of dentistry. 2017 Jul 1; 62: 72-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2017.05.010
Miletic V, Pongprueksa P, De Munck J, Brooks NR, Van Meerbeek B. Monomer-to-polymer conversion and microtensile bond strength to dentine of experimental and commercial adhesives containing diphenyl (2, 4, 6trimethylbenzoyl) phosphine ox ide or a camphorquinone/amine photo-initiator system. Journal of dentistry. 2013 Oct 1; 41(10): 918-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.07.007
Michaud PL, Brown M. Effect of universal adhesive etching modes on bond strength to dual-polymerizing composite resins. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2018 Apr 1; 119(4): 657-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.06.018
Meda EM, Rached RN, Ignácio SA, Fornazari IA, Souza EM. Effect of Different Adhesive Strategies and Time on Microtensile Bond Strength of a CAD/CAM Composite to Dentin. Operative dentistry. 2019 May; 44(3): 262-72. https://doi.org/10.2341/17-338-L
Perdigão J, Muñoz MA, Sezinando A, Luque-Martinez IV, Staichak R, Reis A, Loguercio AD. Immediate adhesive properties to dentin and enamel of a universal adhesive associated with a hydrophobic res in coat. Operative dentistry. 2014 Sep; 39(5): 489-99. https://doi.org/10.2341/13-203-LR
Lezaja Zebic M, Dzeletovic B, Miletic V. Microtensile bond strength of universal adhesives to flat versus Class I cavity dentin with pulpal pressure simulation. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 2018 May; 30(3): 240-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12363
Cengiz T, Ünal M. Comparison of microtensile bond strength and res in-dentin interfaces of two self-adhesive flowable composite resins by using different universal adhesives: Scanning electron microscope study. Microscopy research and technique. 2019 Jul; 82(7): 1032-40. https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.23250
Masarwa N, Mohamed A, Abou-Rabii I, Zaghlan RA, Steier L. Longevity of self-etch dentin bonding adhesives compared to etch-and-rinse dentin bonding adhesives: a systematic review. Journal of Evidence based dental practice. 2016 Jun 1; 16(2): 96-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebdp.2016.03.003
Van Landuyt KL, Snauwaert J, De Munck J, Peumans M, Yoshida Y, Poitevin A, Coutinho E, Suzuki K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. Biomaterials. 2007 Sep 1; 28(26): 3757-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.04.044
Alex G. Universal adhesives: the next evolution in adhesive dentistry. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2015 Jan; 36(1): 15- 26.
Casselli DS, Casselli H, Martins LR. Marginal adaptation of class V composite restorations submitted to thermal and mechanical cycling. Journal of Applied Oral Science. 2013 Feb; 21(1): 68-73. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757201302295
Saghiri MA, Asatourian A, Garcia-Godoy F, Gutmann JL, Sheibani N. The impact of thermocycling process on the dislodgement force of different endodontic cements. BioMed research international. 2013; 2013. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/317185
Ahn J, Jung KH, Son S, Hur B, Kwon YH, Park JK. Effect of additional etching and ethanol-wet bonding on the dentin bond strength of one-step self-etch adhes ives. Restorative dentistry & endodontics. 2015 Feb 1; 40(1): 68-74. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2015.40.1.68
Arhun N, Halacoglu DM, Ozduman ZC, Tuncer D. Efficacy of multi-mode adhesive systems on dentin wettability and microtensile bond strength of resin composite. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology. 2018 Nov 2; 32(21): 2405-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2018.1479130
Choi AN, Lee JH, Son S, Jung KH, Kwon Y, Park JK. Effect of dentin wetness on the bond strength of universal adhesives. Materials. 2017; 10(11): 1224. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10111224
Donmez N, Siso SH, Usumez A, Bayrak I. Effect of thermal cycling on micro-tensile bond strength of composite restorations bonded with multimode adhesive. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology. 2015 Apr 18; 29(8): 7319. https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2014.1003180
Farias DC, de Andrada MA, Boushell LW, Walter R. Assessment of the initial and aged dentin bond strength of universal adhesives. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives. 2016 Oct 1; 70: 53-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.05.008
Hass V, Cardenas AF, Siqueira FS, Pacheco RR, Zago PM, Silva DO, Bandeca MC, Loguercio AD. Bonding Performance of Universal Adhesive Systems Applied in Etch-and-Rinse and Self-Etch Strategies on Natural Dentin Caries. Operative dentistry. 2019 Sep; 44(5): 510-20. https://doi.org/10.2341/17-252-L
Kusdemir M, Çetin AR, Özsoy A, Toz T, Öztürk Bozkurt F, Özcan M. Does 2% chlorhexidine digluconate cavity disinfectant or sodium fluoride/hydroxyethyl methacrylate affect adhesion of universal adhesive to dentin?. Journal of adhesion science and Technology. 2016 Jan 2; 30(1): 13-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2015.1087256
Leite ML, Costa CA, Duarte RM, Andrade AK, Soares DG. Bond Strength and Cytotoxicity of a Universal Adhesive According to the Hybridization Strategies to Dentin. Brazilian dental journal. 2018; 29(1): 68-75. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201801698
Luque-Martinez IV, Perdigão J, Muñoz MA, Sezinando A, Reis A, Loguercio AD. Effects of solvent evaporation time on immediate adhesive properties of universal adhesives to dentin. Dental Materials. 2014 Oct 1; 30(10): 1126-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.07.002
Manfroi FB, Marcondes ML, Somacal DC, Borges GA, Júnior LH, Spohr AM. Bond strength of a novel one bottle multi- mode adhesive to human dentin after six months of storage. The open dentistry journal. 2016; 10: 268. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210601610010268
Muñoz MA, Luque I, Hass V, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Bombarda NH. Immediate bonding properties of universal adhesives to dentine. Journal of dentistry. 2013 May 1; 41(5): 404-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.03.001
Muñoz MA, Luque-Martinez I, Malaquias P, Hass V, Reis A, Campanha NH, Loguercio AD. In vitro longevity of bonding properties of universal adhesives to dentin. Operative Dentistry. 2015 May; 40(3): 282-92. https://doi.org/10.2341/14-055-L
Nicoloso GF, Antoniazzi BF, Lenzi TL, Soares FZ, Rocha RD. The bonding performance of a universal adhesive to artificially-created caries-affected dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2017 Jan 1; 19(4): 317-21.
Pashaev D, Demirci M, Tekçe N, Tuncer S, Baydemir C. The effect of double-coating and times on the immediate and 6- month dentin bonding of universal adhesives. Bio-medical materials and engineering. 2017 Jan 1; 28(2): 169-85. https://doi.org/10.3233/BME-171665
Sezinando A, Luque-Martinez I, Muñoz MA, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Perdigão J. Influence of a hydrophobic resin coating on the immediate and 6-month dentin bonding of three universal adhesives. Dental Materials. 2015 Oct 1; 31(10): e236-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.07.002
Sinhoreti MA, Vitti RP, Abuna G, Feitosa VP. Effect of Bioglass 45S5 air-abrasion on dentin bonding: evaluation of microtensile bond strength and confocal microscopy. Applied Adhesion Science. 2015 Dec; 3(1): 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40563-015-0049-x
Siqueira FS, Cardenas AM, Ocampo JB, Hass V, Bandeca MC, Gomes JC, Reis A, Loguercio AD. Bonding performance of universal adhesives to eroded dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2018 Jan 1; 20(2): 121-32.
Siso SH, Dönmez N, Kahya DS, Uslu YS. The effect of calcium phosphate-containing desensitizing agent on the microtensile bond strength of multimode adhesive agent. Nigerian journal of clinical practice. 2017; 20(8): 964-70.
Sutil BG, Susin AH. Dentin pretreatment and adhesive temperature as affecting factors on bond strength of a universal adhesive system. Journal of Applied Oral Science. 2017 Oct; 25(5): 533-40. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2016-0500
Tekçe N, Tuncer S, Demirci M, Balc i S. Do matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors improve the bond durability of universal dental adhesives?. Scanning. 2016 Nov; 38(6): 535-44. https://doi.org/10.1002/sca.21293
Vermelho PM, Reis AF, Ambrosano GM, Giannini M. Adhesion of multimode adhesives to enamel and dentin after one year of water storage. Clinical oral investigations. 2017 Jun 1; 21(5): 1707-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1966-1
Wagner A, Wendler M, Petschelt A, Belli R, Lohbauer U. Bonding performance of universal adhesives in different etching modes. Journal of dentistry. 2014 Jul 1; 42(7): 800-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.04.012
Zeidan LC, Reis AF, Cassoni A, Rodrigues JA. Effect of six month storage on microtensile bond strength of new elective etching adhesive system on dentin in self-etching or etchand-rinse approach. The Saudi Journal for Dental Research. 2017 Jan 1; 8(1-2): 5-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjdr.2016.06.006
Chen C, Niu LN, Xie H, Zhang ZY, Zhou LQ, Jiao K, Chen JH, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Bonding of universal adhesives to dentine-Old wine in new bottles?. Journal of dentistry. 2015 May 1; 43(5): 525-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.03.004
Guan R, Takagaki T, Matsui N, Sato T, Burrow MF, Palamara J, Nikaido T, Tagami J. Dentin bonding performance using Weibull statistics and evaluation of acid- base resistant zone formation of recently introduced adhesives. Dental materials journal. 2016 Jul 29; 35(4): 68493. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2016-059
Jang JH, Lee MG, Woo SU, Lee CO, Yi JK, Kim DS. Comparative study of the dentin bond strength of a new universal adhesive. Dental materials journal. 2016 Jul 29; 35(4): 606-12. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2015-422
Marchesi G, Frassetto A, Mazzoni A, Apolonio F, D iolosa M, Cadenaro M, Di Lenarda R, Pashley DH, Tay F, Breschi L. Adhesive performance of a multi-mode adhesive system: 1year in vitro study. Journal of dentistry. 2014 May 1; 42(5): 603-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.12.008
Sezinando A, Perdigão J, Ceballos L. Long-term In vitro Adhesion of Polyalkenoate-based Adhesives to Dentin. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2017 Jul 1; 19(4).
Zenobi W, Feitosa VP, Moura ME, D'arcangelo C, de Azevedo Rodrigues LK, Sauro S. The effect of zoledronate- containing primer on dentin bonding of a universal adhesive. Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials. 2018 Jan 1; 77: 199-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.09.015
Zhang ZY, Tian FC, Niu LN, Ochala K, Chen C, Fu BP, Wang XY, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Defy ing ageing: An expectation for dentine bonding with universal adhesives?. Journal of dentistry. 2016 Feb 1; 45: 43-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.11.008
Ozel E, Tuna EB, Firatli S, Firatli E. Comparison of total-etch, self-etch, and selective etching techniques on class V composite restorations prepared by Er: YAG laser and bur: a scanning electron microscopy study. Microscopy research and technique. 2016 Oct; 79(10): 998-1004. https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.22735
