Shear Bond Strength of Metal Brackets Recycling with Aluminum Oxide
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12974/2311-8695.2020.08.6Keywords:
Aluminum Oxide, Orthodontic brackets, Shear strength.Abstract
Objective: to evaluate the shear bond strength of metal brackets subjected to recycling with aluminum oxide.
Methods: 20 premolars were used, divided into two groups (n = 10) according to the brackets used (G1: Morelli® Light and G2: Morelli® Max). The teeth were autoclaved, included in ¾-inch PVC tubes, perpendicular to the ground. The brackets were fixed on the dental crowns with the TransbondTM XT kit (3M Unitek). The specimens were subjected to thermal cycling. The shear test was performed on the Instron® 5582 testing machine, at a speed of 0.5mm / min. The brackets were recycling with aluminum oxide 24 hours after the test. A new shear was performed, similar to the first. The buccal faces of the teeth were qualified through the IRA in both tests. The data were submitted to statistical analysis using the Kruskal-Wallis, ANOVA and Tukey tests (p <0.05).
Results: in the first shear, the bond strength values of Morelli® Max brackets (35,00MPa) were statistically higher than those of Morelli®Light (23,86MPa). In the second, the resistances were statistically similar (Morelli®Max: 37,19 MPa and Morelli®Light: 45,18 MPa). The Morelli® Light bracket was influenced by the recycling of aluminum oxide, with a significant increase in resistance from the first to the second test. There was no significance for the values of the IRA scores in both trials.
Conclusion: recycling with aluminum oxide influenced the shear bond strength of the Morelli®Light bracket, causing an increase in adhesion strength; the Morelli® Max bracket was superior to Morelli® Light before recycling; after recycling, the brackets had similar behaviors.
References
Correia AMO, Matos FS, Jóias RP, Rode SM, Cesar PF, Paranhos LR. Comparative Assessment of Different Recycling Methods of Orthodontic Brackets for Clinical Use. Minerva Stomatol 2017; 66(3): 107-114.
Mirhashemi AH, Hosseini MH, Chiniforoush N, Soudi A, Moradi M. Shear Bond Strength of Rebonded Ceramic Brackets Using Four Different Methods of Adhesive Removal. J Dent (Tehran) 2018; 15(1): 54-62.
Newman GV. Epoxy adhesives for orthodontics attachments: progress report. Am J Orthod 1965; 51: 901-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(65)90203-4
Pithon MM, Oliveira MV, Santana EF, Ruellas ACO. Avaliação da resistência ao cisalhamento do Compósito Eagle Bond. Rev. Saúde. Com 2007; 2 (1): 127-34.
Pakshir HR, Zarif H, Hajipour S. Effect of enamel surface treatment on the bond strength of metallic brackets in rebonding process. Eur J Orthod 2012, 34 (6): 2012. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjr093
Melgaço CA, Andrade CC, Araújo MTS, Nojina LI. Resistência ao cisalhamento de bráquetes metálicos utilizado sistema adesivo autocondicionante. Dental Press J Orthod 2011; 16 (4): 73-78. https://doi.org/10.1590/S2176-94512011000400013
Lugato IC, Pignatta LM, Abrantes FM, Santos EC.Comparison of the shear bond strengths of conventional mesh bases and sandblasted orthodontic bracket bases.Braz Oral Res 2009; 23 (4): 407-14. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242009000400010
Reimann S, Rewari A, Keilig L, Widu F, Jäger A, Bourauel C. Material Testing of Reconditioned Orthodontic Brackets. J Orofac Orthop. 2012; 73(6): 454-66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-012-0108-x
Monteiro MMH, Vicente A, Hernández NA, Lopez, MJ, González LAB, Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Brackets Recycled Using Micro Sandblasting and Industrial Methods. Angle Orthod 2015; 85(3): 461-7. https://doi.org/10.2319/032414-221.1
Melo TRNB, Youssef MN, Ortega OL, Camboim FSO, Costa OS, Andrade, ACM. Shear Bond Strength of Metallic Brackets: an in vitro study. Brazilian Research in Pediatric Dentistry and Integrated Clinic 2015; 15(1): 319-325. https://doi.org/10.4034/PBOCI.2015.151.34
Melo TRNB, Maia AMA, Cavalcanti AL, Nascimento ABL, Valença AMG. Avaliação da Resistência ao Cisalhamento em Dentes Bovinos. Odontologia. Cíin.- Cientif 2006; 5 (4): 275-280.
Tavares SW, Consani S, Nouer D, Magnani MBBA, Pereira Neto JS, Romano F. Evaluation in vitro of the shear bond strenght of aluminum oxide recycled brackets. Braz J Oral Sci 2003; 2 (7): 378-81.
Rastelli CR, Coelho U, Jimenez EE. O. Avaliação da Resistência ao Cisalhamento de Braquetes Ortodônticos colados com Resinas Fluoretadas. Dental Press 2010; 15 (3): 106-113. https://doi.org/10.1590/S2176-94512010000300013
Artun J, Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod 1984; 85 (4): 333-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(84)90190-8
Ann EW, Hardan LS, Bou Serhal JP, Glasl B, Ludwing B. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with self-etching primer to intact and pre-conditioned human enamel. J Orofac Orthop 2008; 69 (5): 383-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-008-0812-8
Ishida K, Endo T, Shinkai K, Katoh Y. Shear bond strength of rebonded brackets after removal of adhesives with Er,Cr:YSGG laser. Odontology 2011; 99 (2): 129-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-011-0012-7
Shetty V, Shekatkar Y, Kumbhat N, Gautam G, Karbelkar S, Vandeka M. Bond Efficacy of Recycled Orthodontic Brackets: A Comparative in vitro Evaluation of Two Methods Indian. J Dent Res 2015; 26(4): 411-5. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9290.167635
Bahnasi FI, Abd-Rahman AN, Abu-Hassan MI. Effects of Recycling and Bonding Agent Application on Bond Strength of Stainless Steel Orthodontic Brackets J Clin Exp Dent 2013; 5(4): e197-202. https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.51113
