Mineralized Allograft Implant Site Preservation in 3-Wall Post-Extraction Sockets in Ten Subjects: Clinical, Radiographic and Histologic Evaluation 

Authors

  • Marco Clementini Department of Clinical Sciences and Translational Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", School of Dentistry, Italy
  • Gianpaolo Sannino Department of Clinical Sciences and Translational Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", School of Dentistry, Italy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12974/2311-8695.2013.01.01.6

Keywords:

Allograft, bone regeneration, histomorphometry, membrane, microradiography, socket.

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of the present investigation was to evaluate the efficacy of a surgical technique using mineralized human allograft and a collagen membrane on counteracting dimensional changes of 3-wall post-extraction socket. 

Materials and Methods: In 10 patients, 10 single extraction sites without the labial bone plate in the anterior area were treated by means of mineralized human allograft and a collagen membrane. Intraoral radiographs and clinical measurement were taken at baseline and after 4 months. At surgical reentry, prior to implant placement, a biopsy core was obtained for histological analysis. 

Results: After 4 months of healing the intraoral radiographs showed a mean difference in bone level height of 0.77 mm (SD ± 0.63), while clinical measurements showed a mean reduction of 1.1 mm (SD ± 0.46) in width, allowing for normal diameter implants placement without the need of further augmentation procedures. The specimens harvested showed bone formation, composed of particles of mineral human bone allograft and newly formed bone trabeculae. 

Conclusion: Alveolar ridge preservation using mineralized human allograft and a collagen membrane allows for preserving height and width of a 3 wall extraction socket, suggesting that it may be useful prior to dental implant placement, especially in the esthetic region. 

References

Amler MH. The time sequence of tissue regeneration in human extraction wounds. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1969; 27(3): 309-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(69)90357-0

Schroeder HE. The periodontium. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag 1986. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-71261-6

Cardaropoli G, Araujo MG, Lindhe J. Dynamics of bone tissue formation in tooth extraction sites. An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 2003; 30(9): 809-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051X.2003.00366.x

Araujo MG, Lindhe J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experi- mental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 2005; 32(2): 212-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00642.x

Schropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L, Karring T. Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following singletooth extraction: a clinical and radiograhic 12- month prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2003; 23(4): 313-23.

Tan WL, Wong TLT, Wong MCM, Lang NP. A systematic review of post-extractional alveolar hard and soft tissue dimensional changes in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23 Suppl 5: 1-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02375.x

Pinho MN, Roriz VL, Novaes ABJr, Taba MJr, Grisi MF, de Souza S.L. & Palioto, D.B. Titanium membranes in prevention of alveolar collapse after tooth extraction. Implant Dent 2006; 15(1): 53-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.id.0000202596.18254.e1

Buser D, Martin W, Belser U. Optimizing esthetics for implant restorations in the anterior maxilla: anatomic and surgical considerations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; 19 Suppl: 43-61.

Pozzi A, Sannino G, Barlattani A. Minimally invasive treatment of the atrophic posterior maxilla: A proof ofconcept prospective study with a follow-up of between 36 and 54 months. J Prosthet Dent 2012; 108(5): 286-297. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60178-4

Sannino G, Marra G, Feo L, Vairo G, Barlattani A.3D Finite element non linear analysis on the stress state at boneimplant interface in dental osseointegrated implants. Oral Implantol (Rome) 2010; 3(3): 26-37.

Sannino G, Barlattani A. Mechanical evaluation of an implant-abutment self-locking taper connection: finite element analysis and experimental tests. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013; 28(1): e17-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2058

Sannino G. All-on-4 Concept: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis. J Oral Implantol 2013 Apr 5

[Epub ahead of print]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-12-00312

Vairo G, Sannino G. Comparative Evaluation of Osseointegrated Dental Implants Based on Platform- Switching Concept: Influence of Diameter, Length, Thread Shape, and In-Bone Positioning Depth on Stress-Based Performance. Comput Math Methods Med 2013; 2013: 250929.

Ten Heggeler JMAG, Slot DE, Van der Weijden GA. Effect of socket preservation therapies following tooth extraction in non-molar regions in humans: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; 22(8): 779-788. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02064.x

Vignoletti F, Matesanz P, Rodrigo D, Figuero E, Martin C, Sanz M. Surgical protocols for ridge preservation after tooth extraction. A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23(Suppl. 5): 22–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02331.x

Vittorini Orgeas G, Clementini M, De Risi V, de Sanctis M. Surgical techniques for alveolar socket preservation: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013; 28(4): 1049-1061. http://dx.doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2670

De Risi V, Clementini M, Vittorini G, Mannocci A, De Sanctis M. Alveolar ridge preservation techniques: a systematic review and meta-analysis of histological and histomorphometrical data. Clin Oral Impl Res 2013; 1-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.12288

Darby I, Chen ST, Buser D. Ridge preservation techniques for implant therapy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009; 24(Suppl.): 260-27.

Iasella JM, Greenwell H, Miller RL, Hill M, Drisko C, Bohra AA, Scheetz JP. Ridge preservation with freeze-dried bone allograft and a collagen membrane compared to extraction alone for implant site development: a clinical and histologic study in humans. J Clin Periodontol 2003; 74(7): 990-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2003.74.7.990

Beck TM, Mealey B. Histologic analysis of healing after tooth extraction with ridge preservation using mineralized human bone allograft. J Periodontol 2010; 81(12): 1765-1772. http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2010.100286

Bertoldi C, Zaffe D, Consolo U. Polylactide/polyglycolide copolymer in bone defect healing in humans. Biomaterials 2008; 29(12): 1817-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.12.034

Zaffe D, D'Avenia F. A novel bone scraper for intraoral harvesting: a device for filling small bone defects. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007; 18(4): 525-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01368.x

Spinato S, Galindo-Moreno P, Zaffe D, Bernardello F, Soardi. CM. Is socket healing conditioned by buccal plate thickness? A clinical and histologic study 4 months after mineralized human bone allografting. Clin Oral Impl Res 2012; 1-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.12073

Van der Weijden F, Dell'Acqua F, Slot DE. Alveolar bone dimensional changes of post-extraction sockets in humans: a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol 2009; 36(12): 1048-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01482.x

Downloads

Published

04-04-2013

How to Cite

Clementini, M., & Sannino, G. (2013). Mineralized Allograft Implant Site Preservation in 3-Wall Post-Extraction Sockets in Ten Subjects: Clinical, Radiographic and Histologic Evaluation . The Journal of Dentists, 1(1), 42–48. https://doi.org/10.12974/2311-8695.2013.01.01.6

Issue

Section

Articles