Investigation of the Role of Rubber Particle Cavitation Resistance on the Toughening Mechanisms of Epoxy Resins

Authors

  • Hamed Vakili Tahami Polymer Engineering and Color Technology Department, Amirkabir University of Technology, P.O. Box 15875-4413, Tehran, Iran
  • Morteza Ebrahimi Polymer Engineering and Color Technology Department, Amirkabir University of Technology, P.O. Box 15875-4413, Tehran, Iran
  • Hossein Yahyaei Polymer Engineering and Color Technology Department, Amirkabir University of Technology, P.O. Box 15875-4413, Tehran, Iran
  • Ehsan R. Mafi Polymer Engineering and Color Technology Department, Amirkabir University of Technology, P.O. Box 15875-4413, Tehran, Iran
  • Reza Bagheri Polymeric Materials Research Group, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, P.O. Box 11155-9466, Tehran, Iran

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12974/2311-8717.2016.04.01.3

Keywords:

Cavitation, epoxy, toughening, fracture.

Abstract

The occurrence of rubber particle cavitation in rubber modified epoxy resins has generated some controversy in the literature and role of cavitation resistance in toughening mechanisms has remained an enigma. In this study, hydroxyl terminated polybutadiene (HTPB) and synthesized epoxy terminated polybutadiene (ETPB) have been used to toughen an epoxy resin. FTIR and titration techniques were used to monitor the ETPB synthesis. Mean fracture toughness, KIC, of 0.65 MPa.m0.5 was measured for unmodified epoxy polymer. The measured toughness was increased by the addition of HTPB to 1.23 MPa.m0.5 and ETPB to 1.80 MPa.m0.5. The cavitation zone of the HTPB modified sample was bigger than that of ETPB modified sample which showed the higher cavitation resistance of ETPB particles. SEM studies showed volumetric expansion of rubbery phase in slow crack growth region of both samples which proved the plastic void growth. The results showed that the elevated cavitation resistance of ETPB did not suppress plastic void growth. The optical microscopy of crack tips showed shear banding which was more significant in ETPB modified sample. SEM micrographs of fracture surface of HTPB modified samples showed no tail formation while pinning tails were present in ETPB modified samples. The results showed that higher cavitation resistance activated crack pinning process and induced larger shear banding zone in ETPB modified samples. Deflection and forking of the main crack into secondary cracks was also observed in ETPB modified samples while these phenomena were not present in HTPB modified samples. 

References

Yee AF and Du J. Toughening of epoxies in polymer blends, Paul DR, Bucknall CB, Eds, John Wiley and Sons. Inc New York 2000; Vol. 2.

Liu Y, Zhang W and Zhou H. Polym Int 2005; 54: 1408-1415. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pi.1862

Dai JB, Kuan HC, Du XS, Daid SC and Ma J. Polym Int 2009; 58: 838-845. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pi.2604

Lee J and Yee AF. Polymer 2000; 41(23): 8363-8373. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0032-3861(00)00187-7

Kawaguchi T and Pearson RA. Polymer 2003; 44(15): 4239-4247. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0032-3861(03)00372-0

Kinloch AJ and Taylor AC. J Mater Sci 2002 37(3): 433-460. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1013735103120

Johnsen BB, Kinloch AJ, Mohammed RD and Taylor AC. Sprenger S, Polymer 2007; 48(2): 530-541. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2006.11.038

Kunz-Douglass S, Beaumont PWR and Ashby MF. J Mater Sci 1980; 15(5): 1109-1123. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00551799

Kunz SC and Beaumont PWR. J Mater Sci 1981; 16(11): 3141-3152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00540323

Frounchi M, Mehrabzadeh M and Parvary M. Polym Int 2000; 49:163-169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097- 0126(200002)49:2<163::AID-PI321>3.0.CO;2-X

Sue HJ and Polym. Eng Sci 1991; 31(4): 275-288.

Manzione LT, Gillham JK and McPherson CA. J Appl Polym Sci 1981; 26(3): 889-905. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/app.1981.070260313

Huang Y and Kinloch AJ. J Mater Sci Lett 1992; 11(8): 484-487. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00731112

Bucknall CB, Karpondis A and Zhang XC. J Mat Sci 1994; 29(13): 3377-3383. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00352036

Mafi ER and Ebrahimi M. Polym Eng Sci 2008; 48(7): 1376-1380. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pen.21104

Bagheri R, Marouf BT and Pearson RA. Polymer Reviews 2009; 49(3): 201-225. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15583720903048227

Bagheri R and Pearson R. A Polymer 1996; 37(20): 4529-4538. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0032-3861(96)00295-9

Guild FJ and Kinloch AJ. J Mater Sci 1995; 30(7): 1689-1697. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00351597

Bowden PB and Haward RN. The physics of glassy polymers. London: Applied Science publishers 1975.

Barcia FL, Amaral TP and Soares BG. Polymer 2003; 44(19): 5811-5819. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0032-3861(03)00537-8

Huang Y, Kinloch AJ, Bertsch R and Sibert AR. Particlematrix interfacial bonding in toughened plastics, Advances in Chemistry Series 233; C. K. Riew, A. J. Kinloch, (Eds); ACS, Washington 1993; pp 189.

Nielsen LE and Landel RF. Mechanical properties of polymers and composites, Marcel Dekker 1994.

Kinloch AJ and Young RJ. Fracture behavior of polymers. Applied Science Publishers, London 1983.

Dieter GE. Mechanical Metallurgy, McGraw-Hill Book Company, London 1988.

Downloads

Published

2016-06-15

How to Cite

Tahami, H. V., Ebrahimi, M., Yahyaei, H., Mafi, E. R., & Bagheri, R. (2016). Investigation of the Role of Rubber Particle Cavitation Resistance on the Toughening Mechanisms of Epoxy Resins. Journal of Composites and Biodegradable Polymers, 4(1), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.12974/2311-8717.2016.04.01.3

Issue

Section

Articles