Airway Management of a Neck-Burned Child with Mc-Grath Series 5 Videolaryngoscope and Gum Elastic Bougie

Authors

  • Ismail Aytaç Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation Ankara Numune Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
  • Betül Güven Aytaç Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation Ankara Etlik Zübeyde Hanım Women’s Health Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
  • Aysun Postaci Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation Ankara Numune Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
  • Müge Cakirca Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation Ankara Numune Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
  • Mustafa Baydar Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation Ankara Numune Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12974/2311-8687.2016.04.01.4

Keywords:

Pediatric airway management, Mc-Grath Series 5 Videolaryngoscope, gum elastic bougie, post-burn neck contracture.

Abstract

Background: Anesthetic management of a neck-burned child presents many problems but especially airway difficulties are characteristic. In addition to differences between pediatric and adult airway, concomitant challenges of postburn sternomental contractures may lead to the catastrophic outcomes. Videolaryngoscope is an alternative intubation device which improves laryngeal view and does not require a direct glottic view. Gum elastic bougie is also a well-known and valuable aid for management of difficult intubation.

Case Report: We presented a successful airway management of a 10 year old boy underwent post-burn contracture releasing surgery for his neck and left upper extremity with Mc-Grath Series 5 videolaryngoscope and gum elastic bougie. The patient had limitation in neck mobility because of severe burn contracture (patient’s neck was contracted in the flexed position, his chin and lower lip was restrained down to the anterior trunk) with lack of any respiratory disorder. After preoxygenation we administered anaesthesia induction. Mask ventilation was failed because of excessive gas leak. So we inserted laringeal mask airway without significant desaturation. After providing adequate ventilation we administered muscle relaxant. After two unsuccessful attempts we performed intubation with Mc-Grath Series 5 videolaryngoscope and gum elastic bougie. We confirmed correct tube placement via capnograph.

Conclusion: Concurent use of Mc-Grath Series 5 videolaryngoscope and gum elastic bougie in management of pediatric difficult airway is suitable as an alternative technique. 

References

Caruso TJ, Janik LS and Fuzaylov G. Airway management of recovered pediatric patients with severe and neck burns: a review. Pediatr Anesth 2012; 22(5): 462-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9592.2012.03795.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9592.2012.03795.x

Heitz JW and Mastrando D. The use of a gum elastic bougie in combination with a videolaryngoscope

[letter]. J Clin Anesth 2005; 17(5): 408-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2005.03.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2005.03.003

Asai T and Shingu K. Use of the videolaryngoscope

[letter]. Anaesthesia 2004; 59: 513. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2004.03771.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2004.03771.x

Onah II. A Classification System for Postburn Mentosternal Contractures. Arch Surg 2005; 140: 671-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.140.7.671 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.140.7.671

Jeong IM, Seo WG, Woo CH, Bae JY, Mun SH and Kim KM. Prediction of difficult intubation in patients with postburn sternomental contractures: Modified Onah class. Korean J Anesthesiol 2009; 57: 290-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2009.57.3.290 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2009.57.3.290

Park CD, Lee HK, Yim JY and Kang IH. Anesthetic management for a patient with severe mento-sternal contracture: difficult airway and scarce venous Access. Korean J Anesthesiol 2013; 64(1): 61-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2013.64.1.61 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2013.64.1.61

Flores AS, Garber SM, Niesen AD, Long TR, Lynch JJ and Wass CT. Clinical application of a novel video camera laryngoscope:a case series venturing beyond the normal airway Journal of Clinical Anesthesia 2010; 22: 201-204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2009.03.016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2009.03.016

Neuhaus D, Schmitz A, Gerber A and Weiss M. Controlled rapid sequence induction and intubation – an analysis of 1001 children. Pediatr Anesth 2013; 23: 734-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pan.12213 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.12213

Long E, Sabato S and Babl FE. Endotracheal intubation in the pediatric emergency department. Pediatr Anesth 2014; 24: 1204-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pan.12490 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.12490

Law JA, Broemling N, Cooper RM, Drolet P, Duggan LV, Griesdale DE, et al. Canadian Airway Focus Group. The difficult airway with recommendations for management—part 2—the anticipated difficult airway. Can J Anaesth 2013; 60: 1119-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12630-013-0020-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-013-0020-x

Jepsen CH, Gätke MR, Thøgersen B, Mollerup LT, Ruhnau B, Rewers M, et al. Tracheal intubation with a flexible fibreoptic scope or the McGrath videolaryngoscope in simulated difficult airway scenarios: A randomised controlled manikin study. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2014; 31(3): 131-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0b013e32836590a7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0b013e32836590a7

Marciniak B, Fayoux P, Laffargue A, Hebrard A and Horber RK. Use of the McGrath series 5 portable Video Laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in Children. Anesthesiology 2008; 109: A785.

Sun Y, Lu Y, Huang Y and Jiang H. Pediatric video laryngoscope versus direct laryngoscope: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Pediatr Anesth 2014; 24: 1056- 65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pan.12458 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.12458

Wallace C and Engelhardt T. Videolaryngoscopes in Paediatric Anaesthesia Current Treatment Options in Pediatrics 2015; 1: 25-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40746-014-0007-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40746-014-0007-z

Saracoglu KT, Eti Z, Kavas AD and Umuroglu T. Straight video blades are advantageous than curved blades in simulated pediatric difficult intubation Pediatric Anesthesia 2014; 24: 297-302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.12298

Laffon M, Thévenin A and Mille Zemmoura B. Glottiscopes and videolaryngoscopes: a rational choice? Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 2013; 32(12): e211-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annfar.2013.10.021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annfar.2013.10.021

Moussa A, Luangxay Y, Tremblay S, Lavoie J, Aube G, Savoie E, et al. Videolaryngoscope for Teaching Neonatal Endotracheal Intubation: A Randomized Controlled Trial Pedıatrıcs 2016; 37(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2015-2156

Kattwinkel J, Perlman JM, Aziz K, et al. Neonatal resuscitation: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Pediatrics 2010; 126: e1400-e1413. http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-2972E DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-2972E

Schmidt AR, Weiss M and Engelhardt T. The paediatric airway Basic principles and current developments Eur J Anaesthesiol 2014; 31: 293-299. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000000023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000000023

Law JA, Broemling N, Cooper RM, Drolet P, Duggan LV, Griesdale DE, et al. Canadian Airway Focus Group. The difficult airway with recommendations for management—part 1- Difficult tracheal intubation encountered in an unconscious/induced patient. Can J Anaesth 2013; 60: 1089-118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12630-013-0019-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-013-0019-3

Sahin M, Anglade D, Buchberger M, Jankowski A, Albaladejo P and Ferretti GR. Case reports:Iatrogenic bronchial rupture following the use of endotracheal tube introducers. Can J Anesth 2012; 59: 963-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12630-012-9763-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-012-9763-z

Cooper RM. Complications associated with the use of the GlideScope videolaryngoscope. Can J Anaesth 2007; 54: 154-157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03021900 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03021900

Leong WL, Lim Y and Sia AT. Palatopharyngeal wall perforation during Glidescope intubation. Anaesth Intensive Care 2008; 36: 870-874. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057X0803600620

Maassen R, Lee R, Hermans B, Marcus M and Van Zundert A. A comparison of three videolaryngoscopes: the Macintosh laryngoscope blade reduces, but does not replace, routine stylet use for intubation in morbidly obese patients. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2009; 109: 1560-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181b7303a DOI: https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181b7303a

Holm-Knudsen R. The difficult pediatric airway – a review of new devices for indirect laryngoscopy in children younger than two years of age Pediatric Anesthesia 2011; 21: 98-103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9592.2010.03487.x

Downloads

Published

2016-06-15

How to Cite

Aytaç, I., Aytaç, B. G., Postaci, A., Cakirca, M., & Baydar, M. (2016). Airway Management of a Neck-Burned Child with Mc-Grath Series 5 Videolaryngoscope and Gum Elastic Bougie. International Journal of Pediatrics and Child Health, 4(1), 28–32. https://doi.org/10.12974/2311-8687.2016.04.01.4

Issue

Section

Articles