A Comparative Study of Effectiveness between Myofascial Release and Pressure Release on Pain and Ankle Range of Motion in Adults with Soleus Myofascial Trigger Points

Authors

  • Yadav Arun Dashmesh College of Physiotherapy, SGT Group of Institutions, Gurgaon, India
  • Yadav Joginder Dashmesh College of Physiotherapy, SGT Group of Institutions, Gurgaon, India
  • Kalra Sheetal Dashmesh College of Physiotherapy, SGT Group of Institutions, Gurgaon, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12974/2313-0954.2014.01.02.6

Keywords:

Myofascial release, Trigger points, Pressure release, 10 point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), Soleus muscle

Abstract

Study Design: Experimental study design.

Background: Myofascial release and Pressure release are the two techniques used for the treatment of active myofascial trigger points. To our knowledge there are no prospective, randomized studies in the literature investigating the comparison between the effects of 2 different manual therapy techniques (myofascial release and pressure release) on myofacsial trigger points of soleus.

Purpose of the study: To determine the effects of Myofascial release and Pressure release techniques on pain and ankle range of motion in patient with soleus myofascial trigger point.

Method: 30 subjects having active myofascial trigger points in soleus muscle were randomly assigned to either control group or experimental group. Readings were taken for Pain using Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and ankle dorsiflexion range of motion (ROM) with goniometer before treatment and immediately after treatment.

Results: Data analysis was performed using SPSS software 17 version. In both the group significant improvement occurred in NRS score and ROM. Between groups analysis revealed that there was no significant difference in NRS score and ROM between both groups.

Conclusion: Both manual therapy techniques i.e. Myofascial release and Pressure release were found to be effective in reducing pain and increasing ankle dorsiflexion range of motion. However the subjects treated with myofascial release and pressure release showed similar benefit in terms of reduction of pain on NRS and improved ROM. Hence it’s concluded that Myofascial release and Pressure release both are effective therapeutic option in the treatment of myofascial trigger point.

References

Simons DG, Travell JG, Myofascial pain and dysfunction: The Trigger point Manual: Volume 2. Upper half of the body. Second edition, Williams and Wilkins, 1999.

Hong CZ. Lidocaine injection versus dry needling to myofascial trigger point. The importance of the local twitch response. Am Jr Phys Med Rehab 1994(73); 256-263.

David L. Myofascial Pain: Relief by Post-isometric Relaxation. Am J Phys Med 1984(65); 452-456/

Veronica, Lisa et al. Clinical precision of myofascial trigger point location in the trapezius muscle pain. 2001(93); 259- 266.

de las CF, Campo MS, Carnero JF, Miangolarra JC. Page Manual therapies in myofascial trigger point treatment: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2007.

Grieve R, Clark J, Pearson E, Bullock S, Boyer C, Jarrett A. The immediate effect of soleus trigger point pressure release on restricted ankle joint dorsiflexion: A pilot randomised controlled trial 2010.

Simons DG. Manual trigger point therapy and dry needling 2010.

Manheim C. The Myofascial Release Mnaual ed. 3 2001.

Kostopoulus. The manual of trigger pointand myofascial therapy. SLACK INCORPORATED. Thorafare NJ 2004.

Shacksnovis R. Effectiveness of myofascial manipulation versus ischaemic compression in the treatment of myofascial trigger points of the upper trapezius muscle 2002; 34-46.

William N. Effectiveness of home programme of ischemic pressure followed by sustained stretch for treatment of myofascial trigger point. Physical Therapy 2000; 80(10).

Downloads

Published

2022-05-25

How to Cite

Arun, Y., Joginder, Y., & Sheetal, K. (2022). A Comparative Study of Effectiveness between Myofascial Release and Pressure Release on Pain and Ankle Range of Motion in Adults with Soleus Myofascial Trigger Points. International Journal of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, 1(2), 61–66. https://doi.org/10.12974/2313-0954.2014.01.02.6

Issue

Section

Articles