A Prospective Audit of Inpatient Medical Oncology Consultation Patterns in a Tertiary Teaching Hospital in South Australia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12974/2313-0946.2014.01.02.2Keywords:
Inpatient consultations, medical oncology, cancer treatment, chemotherapy, hospital consultationAbstract
Objectives: Given the expanding role of medical oncology practice, with increasing therapeutic options for those with advanced malignancy, we sought to document the population of patients receiving inpatient medical oncology consultation. The aim of the study was to document patterns of inpatient referral to medical oncology in order to better understand service needs. We looked to define the relative frequency of cancer types, stage and treatment recommendations.
Design: A large prospective clinical audit was undertaken between January 2005 and January 2007.
Settings: The audit was conducted at the Royal Adelaide Hospital, a major tertiary referral hospital.
Participants: During the two year study period 1,173 consecutive inpatient referrals for medical oncology consultations were included in this analysis.
Main Outcome Measures: Information was collected regarding patient demographics, referral unit, cancer diagnosis and stage, treatment recommendations and follow-up plans.
Results: The most common referral units were General Medicine (19.8%) and Thoracic medicine (15%). The most common primary sites of cancer were lung (22.6%), colorectal (14.9%), primary brain tumours (9.6%) and head and neck (9.3%). The clear majority of patients had Stage 4 disease (80%) and were thus incurable in most cases. Chemotherapy was recommended in 43.7% of patients, chemo-radiation in 12.6% of patients, radiotherapy alone in 16.9% of patients and best supportive care in 24.1% of patients.
Conclusions: This large prospective clinical audit defines the population of patients referred for inpatient medical oncology consultation at our tertiary hospital. Cancer patients are being cared for by a wide variety of non-cancer specialists. The majority of patients have advanced, non-curable disease but anticancer therapy is provided to most with the intention of prolonging survival and maintaining quality of life.
References
Lim E, Rosenthal M A. Diagnosing cancer: changing patterns of care. Internal Medicine Journal 2007; 37: 124-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-5994.2007.01246.x
Richards MA, Parrott JC. Tertiary cancer services in Britain: benchmarking study of activity and facilities at 12 specialist centres. British Medical Journal 1996; 313(7053): 347-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.313.7053.347
Neugut AI, Grann VR. Referral to Medical Oncology: Are there Barriers at the Gate? Journal of Clinical Oncology 2002; 20(7): 1716-1718.
Farag SS, Green MD, Morstyn G, Sheridan WP, Fox RM. Delay in internists in obtaining diagnostic biopsies in patients with suspected cancer. Ann Intern Med 1992; 116: 473-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-116-6-473
Lyne J, Hill M, Burke P, Ryan M. Audit of an inpatient liason psychiatry consultation service. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance 2009; 22(3): 278-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09526860910953548
Ahmad K, Ramsay B. Analysis of inpatient dermatologic referrals; insight into educational needs of trainee doctors. Irish Medical Journal 2009; 178(1): 69-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11845-008-0251-y
Devasagayam D, Clarke D. Changes to inpatient consultation-liaison psychiatry service delivery over a 7-year period. Australasian Psychiatry 2008; 16(6): 418-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10398560802074676
Diagnosis and Management of Metastatic Malignant Disease of Unknown Primary Origin. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) Clinical Guidelines, UK. July 2010.
